{"id":6226,"date":"2017-02-20T12:08:13","date_gmt":"2017-02-20T06:38:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/race4job.com\/blog\/?p=6226"},"modified":"2017-02-20T12:08:13","modified_gmt":"2017-02-20T06:38:13","slug":"sbi-po-expected-questions-reasoning-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/sbi-po-expected-questions-reasoning-4\/","title":{"rendered":"SBI PO Expected Questions In  Reasoning"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Directions (Qs.1-3):<\/strong> In this question, two\/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II have been given.\u00a0 You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow\u00a0 from the given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">1.<strong>Statements :<\/strong> <\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">All dancers are artist. No artist is a racer. \u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(4)<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Conclusion I:<\/strong> <\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">No dancer is racer<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Conclusion II:<\/strong><\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">At least some dancers are racers.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">(1)Either conclusion I or II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (2)Neither conclusion I nor II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (3)Both conclusion I and II are true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (4)Only conclusion I is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (5)Only conclusion II is true<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">2.<strong>Statements <\/strong>: <\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Some rails are trains. Some rails are locals. \u00a0\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(1)<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Conclusion I<\/strong>:<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">At least some trains are locals.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Conclusion II<\/strong>:<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">No train is local.<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">(1)Either conclusion I or II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (2)Neither conclusion I nor II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (3)Both conclusion I and II are true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (4)Only conclusion I is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (5)Only conclusion II is true<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">3.<strong>Statements: <\/strong><\/span><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Some jars are cans. No can is a box. \u00a0\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(1)<\/span><\/span><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Conclusion I:<\/span> <\/strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">No jar is a box<\/span><br \/>\n<strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">Conclusion II:<\/span> <\/strong><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Some jars are boxes<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\">(1)Either conclusion I or II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (2)Neither conclusion I nor II is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (3)Both conclusion I and II are true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (4)Only conclusion I is true<\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> (5)Only conclusion II is true<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Directions (Qs.1-3): In this question, two\/three statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II have been given.\u00a0 You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from the commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow\u00a0 from the given statements, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6226","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6226","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6226"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6226\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6237,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6226\/revisions\/6237"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6226"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6226"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.race4job.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6226"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}